Talk:Kesselhöh
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the article on Kesselhöh. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Put new text under old text. Sign your posts. Be polite and assume good faith. Dates are given as the record gives them. Sources: National Archive · the Herald · law reports.
Kesselhöh is within the scope of the Places project of the Encyclopedia, a collaborative effort to improve its coverage of Places.
B This article has been rated B-class on the Encyclopedia's quality scale and High-importance within the project.
Older discussions are archived after ninety days without comment.
Should Talkirchen be merged here?
I propose merging the article on Talkirchen into this one. It is short, and most of what it says is that it is in Kesselhöh. — MWendl98 (talk) 09:04, 5 June 2019 (VMT)
Oppose. The street directory lists it separately. So should we. — TheoLeirfeld (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2019 (VMT)
Weak support, but I can see the proposal will not pass. — Felix_of_Norrhafen (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2019 (VMT)
Population figure
Could someone update the population to the return of 2026? The article quoted the figure of 2020 until last week. — birgit.moor (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2024 (VMT)
Fine. — TheoLeirfeld (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2024 (VMT)
Done. — Felix_of_Norrhafen (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2024 (VMT)
The infobox
The arms in the infobox are those granted to Kesselhöh, which the register lists as a region. Somebody has asked whether they may be reproduced here. They are reproduced on every lamp post in the place. — Venbier_H (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2025 (VMT)
If a new image is wanted, the Archive licenses its images for the Encyclopedia. The licence takes six to eight weeks. — birgit.moor (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2025 (VMT)
Start a new discussion about improving the article on Kesselhöh. New topics are opened by licensed editors; accounts are issued by the Ministry of Education.